Kerbal Space Program 2 CD Key

Users wrote

Reviews consistently describe the game as abandoned and unfinished, with many stating it will not be completed and that the developers are no longer active. A large portion also highlights pervasive bugs, crashes, and long load times, making the game unrewarding to play. Several reviewers warn that the product was sold at full price during early access and compare it unfavorably to the original Kerbal Space Program. Some still acknowledge the game had potential and appealing visuals, but that potential remains unrealized due to lack of development. Overall, most reviews advise avoiding purchase and suggest sticking with alternatives like KSP1 or Kitten Space Agency.

Last updated: 2026-03-06

Most Mentioned Advantages

• Creative freedom in building and exploration (40 mentions) - Many reviewers value the sandbox gameplay aspect, allowing players to design spacecraft and explore space in open-ended ways. This freedom is cited as a core appeal of the concept. When the game is functioning, these mechanics can deliver satisfying moments of experimentation and discovery.
• Improved visuals and art style (25 mentions) - Several reviews note enhanced visuals and a more modern art direction compared to the original. The visuals contribute to a pleasant space exploration atmosphere when the game runs. This aesthetic appeal can make exploration feel engaging for players who experience stable performance. However, the positives are heavily tempered by the game's technical issues.
• Engaging core concept for space enthusiasts (12 mentions) - A subset of reviews acknowledges that the underlying idea of Kerbal Space Program 2 has strong appeal for fans of spaceflight and simulation. The concept remains loved by some players, providing a basis for potential future improvements. This passion is noted as a reason some still follow updates or await a successor.

Most Mentioned Disadvantages

• Abandoned / unfinished development (75 mentions) - The majority of reviews report that development has stopped, the studio was shut down, or the IP changed hands, leaving the game in an unfinished state. Players describe no meaningful updates for years and express loss of faith in future progress. This abandonment is the dominant factor affecting overall perception of the product.
• Pervasive bugs and performance issues (64 mentions) - Many reviews describe the game as buggy, unstable, and prone to crashes or long loading times. Even when it starts, players report frequent issues that hinder gameplay. The combination of bugs and instability is repeatedly cited as a major complaint.
• Overpriced for an incomplete Early Access product (40 mentions) - Several reviewers feel the game was sold at full price despite lacking essential features and ongoing development. The perception of paying a premium for an unfinished product contributes to strong negative impressions. The pricing is often linked to the promises that were not fulfilled.
• Better alternatives exist (KSP1 or Kitten Space Agency) (35 mentions) - Numerous reviewers recommend returning to Kerbal Space Program 1 or waiting for Kitten Space Agency, noting they are more complete or promising. The suggestion to switch to these alternatives is a common sentiment and reflects disappointment with the current product.
• Promised features not delivered / rug pull perception (25 mentions) - Reviews frequently mention that promised features, such as multiplayer or major roadmap goals, never materialized. Players describe a sense of being misled or deceived by promises and investments, reinforcing distrust toward the publishers and developers.

Compared Games

• Kerbal Space Program 1 (45 mentions) - Many reviewers say to buy KSP1 instead; it is considered more complete and better overall.
• Kitten Space Agency (15 mentions) - Some reviewers mention Kitten Space Agency as a potential successor or more promising option to watch, rather than buying KSP2.
• Juno: New Origins (2 mentions) - A few reviewers reference Juno: New Origins as an alternative to consider.