Conqueror's Blade game cover

Conqueror's Blade CD Key

Lowest Price

FREE
Steam logo
Visit store

Release Date

05 Apr, 2020

Publisher/Developer

Booming Tech, Poros Interactive

Reviews

Steam: 67.32% positive (25884/38449)
Metacritic: -

System Requirements

Minimum:
  • Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
  • OS: Windows 7 64 Bit
  • Processor: Intel I5-4660\AMD FX-8350
  • Memory: 8 GB RAM
  • Graphics: GTX 750TI 2G/AMD RX 550
  • DirectX: Version 11
  • Network: Broadband Internet connection
  • Storage: 40 GB available space

Also owned by players

Conqueror's Blade Steam Price History Chart

Price Information for Conqueror's Blade

Current Best Price: FREE at Steam

Game: Conqueror's Blade

Platform: Steam

Price history chart shows historical Steam pricing data to help you make informed purchasing decisions.

Loading Conqueror's Blade price history chart...

Conqueror's Blade Steam AI Review Summary

SteamAI
Summary generated from 200 most useful Steam user reviews.

Users wrote

Most reviews agree that Conqueror's Blade has strong, engaging combat with large-scale battles and deep strategic options. Many players praise the unique mix of RTS-style unit control and hero-led action, along with frequent seasonal updates. However, there is a broad consensus that monetization, balance issues, and a steep grind hurt the experience for many players, especially newcomers. Technical problems, matchmaking flaws, and community toxicity are repeatedly cited as major drawbacks, tempering the otherwise positive combat-focused impression.

Last updated: 2026-03-06

Most Mentioned Advantages

  • Engaging large-scale combat and strategic depth (12 mentions) - Reviewers consistently praise the game’s massive battles and the strategic options available. The combination of hero leadership and troop management creates intense, dynamic encounters that players find compelling and replayable. The depth of unit variety and battlefield tactics contributes to a rich, tactical experience when the game runs smoothly.
  • Free-to-play accessibility and potential to progress without paying (9 mentions) - Several reviews note that you can play and progress without paying, earning many units and features through gameplay. Content is not strictly locked behind purchases, and some players describe the game as not being strictly pay-to-win. This accessibility is seen as a major positive by a portion of the community.
  • Frequent updates, seasonal content, and community responsiveness (6 mentions) - Reviewers highlight ongoing updates, seasonal content, and the developers’ responsiveness to feedback. The presence of events and refreshed unit sets keeps the game feeling current and gives players ongoing goals to pursue.
  • Extensive unit variety and customization (6 mentions) - Players emphasize the large pool of units with diverse classes and roles, which enables varied strategies and builds. This depth contributes to long-term engagement as players experiment with different compositions and tactics.
  • Hybrid RTS and PvP gameplay with hero control (5 mentions) - The game’s blend of real-time strategy elements with player-controlled heroes provides unique tactical moments. This combination is repeatedly cited as a distinctive and appealing aspect of the title.

Most Mentioned Disadvantages

  • Pay-to-win monetization and balance pressure (15 mentions) - Many reviewers criticize the monetization model and the perception that purchases influence balance and progression. The presence of paid content and premium units is seen by many as giving an unfair edge in competitive modes, undermining the casual player experience.
  • Persistent balance issues and seasonal volatility (14 mentions) - Ongoing balance problems are a common complaint, with new seasons introducing powerful units and mechanics that disrupt fairness for newcomers. The meta shifts frequently, making it hard for new or returning players to compete.
  • Grinding and slow progression for new players (11 mentions) - A frequent gripe is the heavy grind required to unlock units, leadership, and other systems. This leads to a steep learning curve and can feel unrewarding for players joining the game mid-cycle.
  • Poor matchmaking, bots, and community toxicity (9 mentions) - Reviews repeatedly mention bad matchmaking, the presence of bots, and sometimes toxic community dynamics or insufficient moderation. These factors undermine the multiplayer experience for many players.
  • Technical issues and performance problems (9 mentions) - Players report crashes, lag, server instability, and platform-specific problems (including on Steam Deck). These issues can interrupt matches and degrade playability, especially during peak times.

Compared Games

  • Mount & Blade (4 mentions) - Reviewers compare Conqueror's Blade to Mount & Blade for its mix of large-scale battles with hero-led action and real-time unit control.
  • Total War (4 mentions) - Several reviews note similarities to the Total War series, highlighting large battles and strategic planning.
  • Naraka Bladepoint (2 mentions) - Some commenters reference Naraka Bladepoint-like UI and overlays in relation to the game's presentation.
  • Bannerlord (Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord) (2 mentions) - A few players compare the game’s open-world and siege dynamics to Bannerlord.
Users wrote

Advantages mentioned by the majority
Less frequently mentioned disadvantages